If you watch enough seasonal action, all around the NCAA, you will have a good set of picks by the time the NCAA tournament comes through and your bracket will be pristine. . If you can find a good overall defense compared to offensive plays, then you might have reason to believe that they can probably go far, the reason being is that defense wins games when they are so close. Often times the top seeded teams in the country don’t make it past the first few rounds, and while some narrowly escape defeat, all it takes is for one scrappy squad to throw up 3 pointers on a good run, to topple a giant. Look for this, and then make sure that you compare them to a team where they might have trouble with, and you’ll see green as you pick up the money from placing bets with them. Watch out for this, because it will come up and surprise you and the world. However, savvy gamblers will know that when college basketball picks are in, the upset card is possible. You’ll know these teams by how they handle themselves losing in the first half, only to come out in the second like a house on fire.
Another great tip is to look for standout seniors. That’s why college basketball picks are hard to figure out compared to the NBA, there is a lot of different factors to consider.
The upset card is pulled in NCAA basketball a lot. Look for strong defenses to go far and pick your selections based on these things. Many times, it’s small schools from areas like Spokane, Washington or somewhere in the middle of the country to get into the Final Four and really shake up the college world. In order not to be surprised, make sure that you look for teams that have been on the bubble for quite sometime and look for them to prevail. You will often times see a squad full of older players make a lot of noise going into the finals of any major tournament, including NCAA.
When you look at teams on paper, many match up great, however, when you start to peel away things from an individual player’s perspective you can start to see where a team could prevail or collapse. You just have to make sure that you’re following a variety of teams and watching the way they react to the ball in winning and losing.
Every year millions of people place their bets on the big NCAA Basketball tournament that happens annually, and every year there are major upsets and people lose their money when putting faith into the #1 team in the nation. This is especially true for those that have maxed out their eligibility and will be moving on to either the NBA or a chosen career path based on their degree. If there is a squad that has gone to the finals many times and hasn’t won yet, but have a group of seniors that could tip the scales into their favor, bet on them. Finding the best winning college basketball picks is daunting, and for some it’s a painstaking task, but for those that look deeper than the stats, real greatness happens. It’s the veterans of college that don’t go straight to the NBA that seem to make a serious go at the championship before they leave. When you have two evenly matched offensive powerhouses, defense and full court press often times ends up becoming the easiest way to win. For instance, look for a team’s defensive record against others
If we then take a baby, newly born to a pair of alcoholic American parents, and raise it in a small village in southern India where it never encounters alcohol across its lifespan, it will not develop alcoholism. Every minute, every second, the pattern of genes being expressed in your brain changes, often in direct or indirect response to events outside the body. Let’s imagine that a study of alcoholism in the United States finds that the vast majority of the variation in people’s tendencies to drink to excess can be accounted for by variation in their genes. A currently active area of research is the study of epigenetics, and how the many interacting genes that make up any trait are differentially activated depending on the environment.
Many psychologists continue to compute heritability statistics without questioning what exactly it is that they reveal to us. Moore has argued that even this is not significant when we realize that the magnitude of any heritability statistic reflects the extent of variation in unidentified non-genetic factors that contribute to the development of the trait in question.
Adoption studies and twin studies do not entail the purposeful manipulation of either specific genes or specific environmental factors. Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota Study of twins reared apart. Imagine if you were born slightly taller than others (maybe you don’t have to imagine this!). Hence, such studies are unable to generate satisfying understandings of the factors and processes that contribute to the development of intelligence.
Heritability Is Not The Same As Heredity
Heritability does not tell us how likely it is that people’s characteristics will be inherited by their children. Somehow, this finding translates to the media as “parenting doesn’t matter.” This couldn’t be farther from the truth.
This raises a deeper point: Depending on what you hold constant, you can either show a genetic contribution or an environmental contribution. As Moore puts it in his journal article:
Parents Matter, And Will Always Matter
At the very least, heritability tells us how much of the variation in IQ can be accounted for by variation in genetic factors when development occurs in an exquisitely specific range of environments. It makes no sense to ask whether a particular individual’s intelligence has been more determined by nature or by nurture. The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. As already stated, every trait develops through the interplay of genes and the environment. (1990). The way we work gives us choice.
Genes, By Themselves, Can’t Determine Anything
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., Onofio, B, & Gottesman, I.I. Beyond heritability: Twin studies in behavioral research. This would give you more experience in basketball, which increase the chances you’d get picked first for another team. There is reason to believe that under more dire circumstances, the heritability of IQ would be significantly lower than that reported by Bouchard. Genes vary within any group of people (even among the inhabitants of middle-class in Western society), and this variation contributes to variations in these people’s behaviors. Genes could “account for” 100 percent of the variability in a trait in a particular twin study, but this does not mean that environmental factors are therefore unimportant in the development of the trait; parents still matter and will always matter.
The fact that both our genes and our environment contribute to who we are and depend on each other is actually quite a good thing! Give too much control to our environment or our genes, and we lose free will. a trait like height, which is highly heritable in most developed nations, is very affected by environmental factors, like diet). Genes matter to the extent that they support parenting, because like any other behavior, parenting behaviors are influenced by the genes. After reading these facts, it might be reasonable to ask, “Does the heritability coefficient have any practical value?”
Turkheimer’s study should also be a reminder that just because something is heritable doesn’t mean it’s immutable. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 11, 201-211.
In 1990, Thomas J. Therefore, gene-environment interactions are understood to drive the development of all of our characteristics. (2003) The Dependent Gene: The Fallacy of “Nature vs. Likewise, as can be seen from the example below, genetic factors influence the development of non-heritable traits just as much as they influence the development of highly heritable traits.
Let’s be clear: Twin studies have received much criticism. and his colleagues at the University of Minnesota published a striking finding: About 70 percent of the variance in IQ found in their particular sample of identical twins was found to be associated with genetic variation. But does this mean that the variable “has a family” doesn’t matter in determining whether or not a person develops the ability to speak a language? Of course not! That’s like saying that water has no influence on a fish’s development because all fish live in water. But all that we actually inherit from our parents are our genes and our genes’ (and our) environments, factors that then construct full-blown traits during development. After all, if everyone were raised in an identical environment, variations in their psychological characteristics couldn’t possibly be accounted for by anything other than variations in their genes (since there would be no variations in their developmental environments); the more variation in environments that twins in twin studies are exposed to, the lower the heritabilities we should expect to find.
Some of the most well-known behavioral geneticists, including Thomas Bouchard, Jr., recognize that it’s time to move beyond heritability estimates.
The parenting factors that are statistically associated with differences between individuals should never be confused with the parenting factors that cause the development of a trait within an individual. (2009). Psychological Science, 14, 623-628.
Of course, we could just aim to measure all of the environmental factors that might affect the development of a trait. Nature and nurture are complementary, not at odds.
This Blogger’s Books and Other Items from…
Instead, the crucial environmental factors might remain unmeasured, and consequently, variability of those factors across the new range of environments could easily be very different than the variability of those factors across the environments sampled in the original study.
Because adoption and twin studies that seek to account for trait variation in terms of genetic and environmental variation are always correlational, they reveal nothing about the causes of the appearance of the traits.
Deary, I.J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. You get picked first for the basketball team, whereas your smaller friends may not get picked at all. Among the poorest, the shared environment accounted for most of the differences in IQ (60 percent), and the genes accounted for very little. Those who repeatedly don’t get picked for the basketball team may invest in other skills, such as physics or art. Nonetheless, it is quite obvious that genetic factors play a role in determining the number of fingers we have on each of our hands!
In one study, Eric Turkheimer and colleagues studied 320 pairs of 7-year-old twins who were raised in extreme poverty.
Unfortunately, findings from twin studies are often misunderstood, misinterpreted and blown out of proportion — not just by the media, but even by serious scientists who get their work published. Parents matter to the extent that they support the expression of genes.
Environmental factors influence the development of highly heritable traits just as much as they influence the development of non-heritable traits (i.e. The rich tend to get rich, and the poorer tend to get poorer. It’s possible for many traits to involve gene-environment correlations. The problem is that our understanding of the factors that contribute to the development of human traits in general — and to IQ in particular — is currently so deficient that we typically do not know if the environmental factors important in the development of a particular trait are stable across testing situations, vary somewhat across those situations, or vary wildly across those situations.
Johnson, W., Turkheimer, E., Gottesman, I.I., & Bouchard, T.J., Jr. Genes are the mechanisms of experience.
Because the development of behavioral and psychological characteristics can be influenced by experiential factors in ways that are unpredictable from casual observation, we cannot hope to happen to measure — through sheer lucky guesswork — which environmental factors contribute importantly to the development of those characteristics; we first need to understand the mechanisms by which those traits develop.
Twin studies partition the variance in nature and the variance in nurture. Because our psychological characteristics reflect the physical structures of our brains and because our genes contribute to those physical structures, there are unlikely to be any psychological characteristics that are completely unaffected by our DNA. We often talk as if we “inherit” full-blown traits from our parents, like eye colors, nose shapes and shyness. The Flynn effect — the dramatic rise in IQ witnessed in the 20th century — is a good example of that. Even though the proliferation of advanced statistical techniques (such as structural equation modeling) and the implementation of additional controls have allayed some of the concerns, they haven’t allayed all of the them.
Bouchard’s study, along with many others, has painted a consistent picture: Genes matter. (2003).
Therefore, when it comes to understanding the development of a trait in a particular person, nature can never be separated from nurture. Consequently, it doesn’t matter how heritable a trait is; if development of the offspring occurs in a different environment than the parent developed in, most bets are off.
[Genes] are devices for extracting information from the environment. This cycle continues to magnify observed ability differences in basketball between those who keep getting opportunities to increase their skills and those who didn’t get picked that first time. This study points to the fact that estimates of heritability depend on the sample that is studied, and the environment of that sample.
The authors of many twin studies have claimed that the environments experienced by twins (or any two siblings) do little to create differences in intelligence and personality as adults. (2010). Consequently, in this study, the heritability of IQ was reported to be close to zero! Among the richest, however, the heritability of IQ approached what Bouchard found: Variations in the genes accounted for most of the differences in IQ scores, and the shared environment accounted for very little of the variance. Since every single person in twin studies checks that box — that is, they are raised in a family of some sort — this factor never varies and thus does not predict differences in ability to speak a language. Naked DNA (or RNA) is simply not sufficient to produce psychological or biological traits.
Does Heritability Have Any Practicality?
Bouchard, , T.J., Lykken, D.T., McGue, M., Segal, N.L., & Tellegen, A. But it is not at all obvious prior to developmental analysis which environmental factors might make important contributions to the development of specific traits, so that approach would leave us measuring a seriously unwieldy number of variables.
In fact, the least heritable features of human nature may be those that appear to be the most genetically determined! Consider the fact that having 5 fingers on each of our hands is not a particularly heritable characteristic (because most finger number variations in humans are attributable not to genetic variation, but to variations in experiences, such as accidents). Unfortunately, careful consideration of these statistics suggests that they might not be applicable in any meaningful way, and so, consequently, are uninteresting at best and misleading at worst.
Twin Studies Do Not Reveal The Causes Of Intellectual Development
Heritability Depends Entirely On Context
Because heritability is a population statistic, it has nothing to say about the individual. Nature and nurture are inextricably intertwined, and it’s time for science to figure out how.
Heritability Doesn’t Necessarily Have To Do With Biology
Because we cannot assess the variability (across our testing environments) of all the yet-to-be-identified non-genetic factors that influence IQ, Moore argues that estimates of the heritability of IQ are effectively uninterpretable and unable to be applied in any appropriate way. The genes and environment eventually become correlated.. Because we know that genes play some role in the development of any trait, the precise heritability estimate doesn’t matter in a practical sense.
It’s very easy to imagine how slight genetic predispositions can get magnified through the course of development by the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 217-220.
It’s important to keep in mind that the route from genotype (genetic makeup) to phenotype (observed behavior) is hardly ever clear-cut. To put things in perspective, I teamed up with the well-known developmental psychologist at Pitzer College, David S. The causal route from genes to behavior is often very complex!
Heritability depends on the amount of variability in the environmental factors that contribute to a trait. Bouchard, Jr. The idea here is that environments set off an appetite in the genes that nudges individuals to engage in certain experiences, and the environment then responds in a reciprocal fashion that reinforces an individual’s nature. Nurture.” New York, NY: Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
Take the most essential element: a child needs to be raised in a family, almost any kind of family, to develop the ability to speak a language. Moore, to list eight facts about genes, twin studies, and the heritability statistic that may come as a surprise to many people — even biologists!
Heritability Says Nothing About Whether Intelligence Is More Determined By Genes Or The Environment
Even if a population of individuals were to develop in a range of environments believed to be the same as that in which a particular study was conducted, the results of that study would not allow us to predict developmental outcomes in the new range of environments because the environmental factors that the researchers originally focused on — and controlled for — might not be the relevant environmental factors at all.
The heritability of a trait can vary from 0.00 to 1.00, depending on the environments from which research participants are sampled. The studies say nothing about how they matter, or which genes matter, but they show quite convincingly that they indeed do matter. Science, 250, 223-228. The point is that both are always contributing to the development of any trait, and context matters in which accounts for more of the differences in a trait.
Moore, D.S.. Because traits that are 100 percent heritable can nonetheless be strongly influenced by environmental factors, it is not the case that a trait found to be heritable in a particular twin study will be passed from a given pair of parents to their children. Science writer Matt Ridley has put it this way:
The Actual Heritability Value Simply Does Not Matter
We hope these eight facts have cleared up some misunderstandings. Furthermore, identical twins reared apart were eerily similar to identical twins reared together on various measures of personality, occupational and leisure-time interests, and social attitudes.
Even so, the findings from twin studies should not be understated; it counters many a prevailing belief that we are born into this world as blank slates, completely at the mercy of the external environment. However, David S. Just because a variable doesn’t vary doesn’t mean it has no causal impact on a particular outcome.
None of the twins in Bouchard’s study were reared in real poverty, were raised by illiterate parents, or were mentally retarded. The Flynn effect should be a reminder of just how much the environment matters, even after completely controlling for genes (by looking at IQ changes across generations).
In reality, all biological and psychological characteristics are constructed during development, when genes interact with local environmental factors that can be influenced by the broader environment. This allows researchers to determine whether differences in genes or differences in the environment in a particular population are associated with more of the differences in observed behavior.
It turns out that parenting matters, just in a way different than originally assumed. Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children